The Canadian application process and alternate pathway for COVID-19‒related clinical trials
This article offers an overview of the clinical trial application process and guidance on the regulatory obligations pursuant to Part C, Division 5, of the Food and Drug Regulations “Drugs for Clinical Trials Involving Human Subjects” in Canada. The authors focus on clinical trial applications only for biologics (schedule D) and pharmaceuticals (schedule F). They provide information on a range clinical trial submission requirements and communication with Health Canada’s relevant directorates and offices.
Introduction
The Health Products and Food Branch (HPFB) of Health Canada is the scientific and regulatory authority for health products and food in Canada.1 The investigational product classification for pharmaceuticals or biologics is designated by the directorate within HPFB, which will review and authorize the clinical trials.2 Clinical trial inspections are overseen by the Regulatory Operations and Enforcement Branch (Figure 1).
Part C, Division 5, of the Food and Drug Regulations (FDR), which came into effect on 1 September 2001, provides the regulatory guide and framework for the conduct of clinical trials in humans. Health Canada issued the guidance document, which incorporates International Council for Harmonization (ICH) E6(R2) Addendum fundamentals on good clinical practice and ethical and scientific quality standards for trials with human participants.3
Except for phase 4 studies, clinical trial sponsors must submit a clinical trial application (CTA) to Health Canada for authorization to sell or import a drug for the purpose of a clinical trial. CTAs are required for trials using drugs that are not authorized for sale in Canada, as well as trials using marketed drugs in which the proposed use of the drug is considered “off label.” This includes marketed drugs being used for a nonapproved indication or in a different target population than that for which it is approved, and/or if the route of administration or dosage regimens are outside the parameters of the notice of compliance (NoC) or drug identification number.
Health Canada must review the submission package and issue a no-objection letter (NOL) before initiation of a clinical trial or implementation of a CTA amendment (CTA-A). A CTA-A must be submitted after the initial CTA if any substantial changes are made to the initially approved protocol or quality (chemistry and manufacturing) information. Importation of investigational products may not occur until the sponsor has received the NOL.
CTAs should be sent to one of two review directorates within the HPFB of Health Canada. Pharmaceuticals are reviewed by the Office of Clinical Trials at the Therapeutic Products Directorate (TPD), and biologics and radiopharmaceuticals at the Biologic and Radiopharmaceutical Drugs Directorate (BRDD). For clinical trials involving both a pharmaceutical and a biologic, the lead directorate should be designated and the submission should be addressed accordingly. For clinical trials involving an investigational medical device, including an ancillary-use device, an investigational testing authorization, ITA, may be required.
Regulations require clinical trial sponsors located outside of Canada to designate a senior medical or scientific officer who resides in Canada to represent them. The officer must sign a specific attestation related to the trial, for example Appendix 3 of the HC/SC 3011 Drug Submission Application Form, for every CTA/CTA-A submitted to Health Canada.4
Clinical trial application format
Health Canada has been accepting regulatory submissions in the electronic common technical document (eCTD) format since 2004. The eCTD format allows for an electronic method of exchange, review, and management of health product information, but it requires the Common Electronic Submission Gateway (CESG) to manage regulatory transactions securely. Electronic documents are uploaded into the Health Canada viewing tool upon receipt. For many stakeholders, access to the CESG is not an option, and they may submit in “non-eCTD, electronic-only” format. CTA submissions made in non-eCTD format are provided to Health Canada on a CD-ROM and sent via courier or email. Non-eCTD submissions must include a cover letter, in both electronic and paper format, to identify the content of the submission. Paper submissions are no longer accepted.
The CTA is composed of three parts, or modules, in accordance with the CTD format:4
Alternately, Health Canada accepts quality information in EU Investigational Medicinal Product Dossier (IMPD) format, which can be included in Module 2. For CTAs to the TPD, a quality overall summary with the introduction section should be submitted along with the IMPD.
Folder structure
The content of the electronic media should be organized into folders according to a set structure (Figure 2). There are no requirements for file-naming conventions. However, Health Canada recommends that the file names be kept as brief and as meaningful as possible. Files should not be password protected and the PDF is the recommended format for electronic documents. PDF files should also be properly bookmarked.
In line with Figure 2, the CTA includes two Canada-specific summaries:
Transmission of electronic data
CTAs and CTA-As can be submitted on electronic media in the form of a CD-R or a DVD, usually sent via courier. The submission must be organized in accordance with the current electronic specifications as outlined in the Health Canada issued guidance document for preparing submissions in the non-eCTD electronic-only format.5
By email
CTA notifications (CTA-Ns) should be provided to Health Canada via email, sent to the appropriate Directorate.
Regulatory transactions provided by email should meet the following requirements:
The maximum email size accepted by the corporate mail server is 20 MB, anything larger should be sent on media.
Clinical trial application-review process
Pre-CTA meeting
Applicants have the option to apply for a pre-CTA consultation meeting with Health Canada to obtain guidance on complex issues that may arise during the application or review processes. Requests for pre-CTA meetings must be submitted in writing and should include a brief synopsis of the proposed study and a list of preliminary questions to be addressed by the appropriate directorate. Once the request is approved, the directorate will confirm the meeting date and the number of copies of the pre-CTA information package to be provided 30 days before the confirmed meeting date.
After the pre-CTA meeting, the sponsor must prepare a written summary of the discussions, which will be added to the central registry file for the drug. The CTA should include a copy of the meeting record.
Screening process
All CTAs are subject to the 30-day default period from the date of receipt of the completed application. The directorate will issue an acknowledgment letter, or acknowledgment of receipt (AoR), to indicate the start of the review period and that Health Canada is in receipt of a complete application. A control number will also be issued for the application on the AoR.
All CTAs and CTA-As will be screened for completeness. If deficiencies are identified at screening, these will be addressed through a screening clarification request (issued by the TPD) or a screening information letter or process hold (issued by the BRDD) sent via email or fax. There is no timeframe specified for the TPD, but the “review clock” will stop until a satisfactory response is received from the sponsor. Sponsors should respond to screening information letters issued during screening within 2 days for the BRDD and, if a process hold is used, the review clock is stopped and a response is expected within 7 days.
A screening rejection letter may be issued if the required information has not been included in the CTA or CTA-A, or responses to requests for clarification have not been received in a timely manner. If the sponsor wishes to resubmit the information later, the application may be withdrawn without prejudice and resubmitted as a new CTA or CTA-A.
Review process
During the review process, the sponsor is responsible for resolving issues identified by Health Canada. Sponsors must provide the requested information within 2 calendar days. A “not satisfactory notice”, or NSN, may be issued if significant deficiencies are identified during review of the CTA or CTA-A, or if a timely response to the information requested has not been provided. If the applicant wishes to resubmit the information and material at a future time, it will be processed as a new CTA or CTA-A and assigned a new control number as per the guidance on management of drug submissions.4
If the CTA or CTA-A is deemed acceptable, an NOL will be issued within the 30-day review period (Figure 3).
CTA amendments
CTA-As are submitted to Health Canada when there is a change to the information in the previously authorized application. This includes changes to the protocol and/or the quality information, or changes that affect the quality or the safety of the drug. CTA-As must be reviewed and approved by Health Canada before implementation unless there is imminent danger to the health or safety of clinical trial subjects. If the sponsor has to make an immediate change to the study protocol to protect patient safety, then Health Canada must be notified within 15 days after the date of implementation of the amendment and provide sufficient rationale and documentation to support the changes. A summary of changes to the protocol, as well as the rationale for each change, should be included.
A CTA-A must be filed when the proposed amendments to the protocol:
Protocol changes should also be reflected in the updated informed consent form (ICF), if applicable. Copies of the tracked changes to the ICF should be included with the CTA-A submission.
Quality amendments
Sponsors must file a CTA-A or CTA-N for changes to made to the quality summary of the drug in Module 2 or Module 3, if applicable. Examples may include, but are not limited to, the replacement or addition of a drug substance or product manufacturing site, changes to specifications for the drug substance or product, or shelf-life reductions owing to stability concerns.
Because submission requirements differ between the BRDD and TPD, the applicant should reference the Health Canada issued guidance document for clinical trial4 for detailed information.
Similar to CTAs, CTA-As should be organized and numbered as per the CTD format and submitted via electronic media with a hard copy cover letter as per the specifications in the Health Canada guidance document on preparing drug regulatory activities in the non-eCTD electronic-only format.5 The screening and review timelines for CTA-As are the same as those for CTAs. If the CTA-A is deemed acceptable, an NOL will be issued within the 30-day review period.
CTA notifications
Changes to an application not meeting the criteria for CTA-As should be submitted as notifications within 15 days of the change. Notifications should be submitted electronically and may be implemented immediately after submission.
Notifications may include, but are not limited to:
CTA-Ns can be sent via email to the appropriate directorate in a zipped file with an accompanying cover letter.
Additional post-authorization, pretrial requirements4
Research ethics board review
The proposed trial protocol/protocol amendment and the ICF must be reviewed and approved by a Research Ethics Board (REB) before initiation of a CTA or implementation of CTA-A. If the sponsor receives a refusal from another ministry of health (e.g., another country in a multinational trial) or ethics committee, then a notification should be submitted to Health Canada and the affiliated REB.
An REB attestation form, or a similar attestation, must be obtained and signed by the REB chair that approves the CTA/CTA-A at each site. The form should be retained at the sites and not submitted to Health Canada unless requested.
Qualified investigators
Only one qualified investigator (QI) is allowed per site. The QI must complete a qualified investigator undertaking form or develop similar documentation that meets the requirements of the regulations [C.05.012(3)(f)]3. The form should not be submitted to Health Canada unless requested.
CTSI form
A clinical trial site information (CTSI) form for each participating site should be submitted to the appropriate directorate before starting a clinical trial or implementing a CTA-A (applies to clinical amendments only). In addition, if there is a change in the site address, or if the REB with which the site is affiliated is changed, a new CTSI form should be submitted to Health Canada.
Lot release information (for biologics only)
Biologic lots intended for use in a clinical study are subject to a lot-release program requirement before the lot is used in a clinical study. Previously, all biologics lots used in a clinical study were subject to this requirement. However, as of 8 July 2020, this requirement is applicable only to:
Importation of clinical trials drugs
If the investigational product is imported, the importer should be authorized by the sponsor. The importer should be included in Appendix 1 of the application form (HC3011) and submitted to Health Canada. Importer information can be submitted with the initial CTA or later when determined.
Importation of additional drugs
For additional drugs (comparator, concomitant, and rescue medications) that have to be imported into Canada, a summary of additional drugs (SOAD) form must be submitted to Health Canada. A Health Canada official will sign the form and return it with the NOL. If the form was not submitted during the initial CTA, it should be submitted as a CTA-N before shipping the drugs to Canada. The signed SOAD form should accompany the shipment.
Labeling requirements
The investigation product should be labeled per section C.05.011 of the Food and Drug Regulations. The regulation applies to both inner and outer labels and commercially available products considered as investigational. Labels are not submitted to Health Canada unless requested.
Post-authorization, post-commencement requirements4
Changes to previously authorized CTA
Changes to any information submitted as a part of the initial CTA should be submitted to Health Canada. The changes can be submitted as a CTA-A or CTA-N, as discussed earlier in this article, based on the type of change and its impact.
Premature discontinuation of a trial
A CTA-N should be submitted as soon as possible, but no later than 15 calendar days after such decision.
Resumption of a trial after discontinuation
A CTA-N should be submitted with the proposed re-initiation date if there is no change to the authorized study documents. In the event a protocol or quality information is amended to facilitate the continuation of the trial, a CTA-A may be required, depending on the nature of the changes.
Study completion/site closures
A CTA-N to the relevant directorate should be submitted in the event of a site closure or completion of a study.
A study is considered to have been completed after the last subject has complete the end-of-study visit, as defined in the protocol. This does not include study suspension, cancellation, or closure of the trial in Canada. The end-of-study visit is the final visit for study-related tests and procedures, including the capture of any final potential study-related adverse events.
Safety reporting
Health Canada should be informed in an expedited manner of any serious, unexpected adverse drug reactions, as described in the timelines as below:
Updated investigator's brochure
An updated investigator's brochure, including all safety information and global status, should be submitted annually. If there is a determination that the brochure is not required, a CTA-N stating as much should be submitted.
Record retention
The sponsor is required to maintain complete and accurate records of all trial-related activities. The records are to be retained for 25 years. If any records are requested by the relevant directorate, they must be made available within 2 days.
An alternate pathway for COVID-19‒specific trials8
On 23 May 2020, an Interim Order (IO) was issued regarding COVID-19‒related clinical trials for medical devices and drugs in response to an urgent need for the diagnosis, treatment, mitigation, or prevention of COVID-19. The IO is a temporary measure that provides an alternate pathway to enable the initiation of clinical trials for potential drugs and medical devices for COVID-19 while upholding strong patient safety requirements and validity of trial data. The IO will be in effect for a year.
Health Canada issued two guidance documents to support the IO:
The existing regulations and guidance for all clinical trials that are not COVID-19 related and are not in-scope would continue to apply.
Applicants for COVID-19 drug and medical device clinical trials can apply for authorization under one of the following:
It is important to note that COVID-19 trials that had commenced before 20 May 2020 cannot be transitioned to the new pathway under IO.
Modernization of clinical trials regulations
Clinical trial business models have evolved from the traditional linear clinical trial model (preclinical, clinical, and post-launch studies) as most of the innovative novel approaches are not suited under current regulations. For example, master protocols, such as basket trials and umbrella trials, are novel designs that facilitate evaluations of more than one investigational medicinal product and/or more than one type of indication within the same overall trial structure. To facilitate such evaluations, the study includes a master protocol/study and sub-protocols/studies, as required. Currently, Health Canada reviews CTAs on a per-protocol basis. In case master protocol trial designs are utilized, a separate CTA should be submitted for each sub-protocol. This leads to an increased regulatory and financial burden. To address such issues, Health Canada is proposing to amend the current clinical trial regulations to introduce a coherent risk-based approach for oversight of conduct clinical trial and enable increased flexibility in the safe development of innovative therapies.11-13 In addition, there are several other modernization initiatives Health Canada is proposing, including a reduced record retention proposal, from 25 years to 15 years, to better align with global regulators.14
Conclusion
Canada continues to be an attractive destination for the conduct of clinical trials. With shorter approval timelines and considerably more universal submission requirements, the Canadian framework will continue to be an appealing option for pharmaceutical companies and research institutions to make significant investments in Canadian clinical trial health research.
Abbreviations
BRDD, Biologic and Radiopharmaceutical Drugs Directorate; CESG, Common Electronic Submission Gateway; CTA, clinical trial application; CTA-A, CTA amendment; CTA-N, CTA-notification; eCTD, electronic common technical document; EU, European Union; FDR, Food and Drug Regulations; HPFB, Health Products and Food Branch; ICH, International Council for Harmonization; IMPD, Investigational Medicinal Product Dossier; NoC, notice of compliance; NOL, no-objection letter; PSEAT, Protocol Safety and Efficacy Assessment Template; QI, qualified investigator; REB, Research Ethics Board; SOAD, summary of additional drugs; TPD, Therapeutic Products Directorate.
References
All websites accessed on 31 July 2020, unless noted otherwise.
Acknowledgment
The authors thank Daniel Mannix for his guidance and recommendations during the development of this article.
About the authors
Mukesh Kumar, RAC, is a regulatory specialist with PRA Health Sciences, with more than 6 years’ experience in the pharmaceutical regulatory sector. Kumar has experience in developing regulatory strategies and writing high-quality regulatory submissions (NDS, NDA, SNDS, CTA/CTA-A, 510(k)s) for drugs, biologics, and medical devices. He has a postgraduate certificate in Pharmaceutical Regulatory Affairs from Humber College, Canada. He can be reached at kumarmukesh@prahs.com.
Melanie Oakley has worked for more than 18 years in clinical research, mainly for large contract research organizations. She spent 8 years as a clinical research associate before switching to regulatory affairs, 8 years ago, while living and working in the UK. Oakley’s current role as a manager of global regulatory affairs at PRA Health Sciences includes preparation and submission of Canadian clinical trial applications. She can be reached at oakleymelanie@prahs.com.
Citation Kumar M, Oakley M. Overview of the Canadian clinical trial application process and alternate pathway for COVID-19‒related trials. Regulatory Focus. August 2020. Regulatory Affairs Professional Society.
Introduction
The Health Products and Food Branch (HPFB) of Health Canada is the scientific and regulatory authority for health products and food in Canada.1 The investigational product classification for pharmaceuticals or biologics is designated by the directorate within HPFB, which will review and authorize the clinical trials.2 Clinical trial inspections are overseen by the Regulatory Operations and Enforcement Branch (Figure 1).
Part C, Division 5, of the Food and Drug Regulations (FDR), which came into effect on 1 September 2001, provides the regulatory guide and framework for the conduct of clinical trials in humans. Health Canada issued the guidance document, which incorporates International Council for Harmonization (ICH) E6(R2) Addendum fundamentals on good clinical practice and ethical and scientific quality standards for trials with human participants.3
Except for phase 4 studies, clinical trial sponsors must submit a clinical trial application (CTA) to Health Canada for authorization to sell or import a drug for the purpose of a clinical trial. CTAs are required for trials using drugs that are not authorized for sale in Canada, as well as trials using marketed drugs in which the proposed use of the drug is considered “off label.” This includes marketed drugs being used for a nonapproved indication or in a different target population than that for which it is approved, and/or if the route of administration or dosage regimens are outside the parameters of the notice of compliance (NoC) or drug identification number.
Health Canada must review the submission package and issue a no-objection letter (NOL) before initiation of a clinical trial or implementation of a CTA amendment (CTA-A). A CTA-A must be submitted after the initial CTA if any substantial changes are made to the initially approved protocol or quality (chemistry and manufacturing) information. Importation of investigational products may not occur until the sponsor has received the NOL.
CTAs should be sent to one of two review directorates within the HPFB of Health Canada. Pharmaceuticals are reviewed by the Office of Clinical Trials at the Therapeutic Products Directorate (TPD), and biologics and radiopharmaceuticals at the Biologic and Radiopharmaceutical Drugs Directorate (BRDD). For clinical trials involving both a pharmaceutical and a biologic, the lead directorate should be designated and the submission should be addressed accordingly. For clinical trials involving an investigational medical device, including an ancillary-use device, an investigational testing authorization, ITA, may be required.
Regulations require clinical trial sponsors located outside of Canada to designate a senior medical or scientific officer who resides in Canada to represent them. The officer must sign a specific attestation related to the trial, for example Appendix 3 of the HC/SC 3011 Drug Submission Application Form, for every CTA/CTA-A submitted to Health Canada.4
Clinical trial application format
Health Canada has been accepting regulatory submissions in the electronic common technical document (eCTD) format since 2004. The eCTD format allows for an electronic method of exchange, review, and management of health product information, but it requires the Common Electronic Submission Gateway (CESG) to manage regulatory transactions securely. Electronic documents are uploaded into the Health Canada viewing tool upon receipt. For many stakeholders, access to the CESG is not an option, and they may submit in “non-eCTD, electronic-only” format. CTA submissions made in non-eCTD format are provided to Health Canada on a CD-ROM and sent via courier or email. Non-eCTD submissions must include a cover letter, in both electronic and paper format, to identify the content of the submission. Paper submissions are no longer accepted.
The CTA is composed of three parts, or modules, in accordance with the CTD format:4
- Module 1 contains the administrative and clinical information about the proposed trial.
- Module 2 contains quality (chemistry and manufacturing) summaries about the drug products to be used in the clinical trial.
- Module 3 contains any additional supporting quality information (if applicable)
Alternately, Health Canada accepts quality information in EU Investigational Medicinal Product Dossier (IMPD) format, which can be included in Module 2. For CTAs to the TPD, a quality overall summary with the introduction section should be submitted along with the IMPD.
Folder structure
The content of the electronic media should be organized into folders according to a set structure (Figure 2). There are no requirements for file-naming conventions. However, Health Canada recommends that the file names be kept as brief and as meaningful as possible. Files should not be password protected and the PDF is the recommended format for electronic documents. PDF files should also be properly bookmarked.
In line with Figure 2, the CTA includes two Canada-specific summaries:
- Protocol Safety and Efficacy Assessment Template (PSEAT). A protocol synopsis in the defined format of a PSEAT should be submitted. This requirement is for TPD only, and, although it is not a requirement for BRDD, it is recommended to submit a PSEAT to facilitate review. The PSEAT is required for the initial CTA only.6
- Module 2 Quality Overall Summary. Health Canada has made available three templates, one for each trial phase (1, 2, and 3). This is required for CTAs sent to TPD only.
Transmission of electronic data
CTAs and CTA-As can be submitted on electronic media in the form of a CD-R or a DVD, usually sent via courier. The submission must be organized in accordance with the current electronic specifications as outlined in the Health Canada issued guidance document for preparing submissions in the non-eCTD electronic-only format.5
By email
CTA notifications (CTA-Ns) should be provided to Health Canada via email, sent to the appropriate Directorate.
Regulatory transactions provided by email should meet the following requirements:
The maximum email size accepted by the corporate mail server is 20 MB, anything larger should be sent on media.
- The regulatory transaction should be organized in folders and provided as a zipped file.
- The body of the email should contain only the zipped regulatory transaction. No other documents or related information should be included.
- Zipped files and documents contained in the email should not be password protected.
Clinical trial application-review process
Pre-CTA meeting
Applicants have the option to apply for a pre-CTA consultation meeting with Health Canada to obtain guidance on complex issues that may arise during the application or review processes. Requests for pre-CTA meetings must be submitted in writing and should include a brief synopsis of the proposed study and a list of preliminary questions to be addressed by the appropriate directorate. Once the request is approved, the directorate will confirm the meeting date and the number of copies of the pre-CTA information package to be provided 30 days before the confirmed meeting date.
After the pre-CTA meeting, the sponsor must prepare a written summary of the discussions, which will be added to the central registry file for the drug. The CTA should include a copy of the meeting record.
Screening process
All CTAs are subject to the 30-day default period from the date of receipt of the completed application. The directorate will issue an acknowledgment letter, or acknowledgment of receipt (AoR), to indicate the start of the review period and that Health Canada is in receipt of a complete application. A control number will also be issued for the application on the AoR.
All CTAs and CTA-As will be screened for completeness. If deficiencies are identified at screening, these will be addressed through a screening clarification request (issued by the TPD) or a screening information letter or process hold (issued by the BRDD) sent via email or fax. There is no timeframe specified for the TPD, but the “review clock” will stop until a satisfactory response is received from the sponsor. Sponsors should respond to screening information letters issued during screening within 2 days for the BRDD and, if a process hold is used, the review clock is stopped and a response is expected within 7 days.
A screening rejection letter may be issued if the required information has not been included in the CTA or CTA-A, or responses to requests for clarification have not been received in a timely manner. If the sponsor wishes to resubmit the information later, the application may be withdrawn without prejudice and resubmitted as a new CTA or CTA-A.
Review process
During the review process, the sponsor is responsible for resolving issues identified by Health Canada. Sponsors must provide the requested information within 2 calendar days. A “not satisfactory notice”, or NSN, may be issued if significant deficiencies are identified during review of the CTA or CTA-A, or if a timely response to the information requested has not been provided. If the applicant wishes to resubmit the information and material at a future time, it will be processed as a new CTA or CTA-A and assigned a new control number as per the guidance on management of drug submissions.4
If the CTA or CTA-A is deemed acceptable, an NOL will be issued within the 30-day review period (Figure 3).
CTA amendments
CTA-As are submitted to Health Canada when there is a change to the information in the previously authorized application. This includes changes to the protocol and/or the quality information, or changes that affect the quality or the safety of the drug. CTA-As must be reviewed and approved by Health Canada before implementation unless there is imminent danger to the health or safety of clinical trial subjects. If the sponsor has to make an immediate change to the study protocol to protect patient safety, then Health Canada must be notified within 15 days after the date of implementation of the amendment and provide sufficient rationale and documentation to support the changes. A summary of changes to the protocol, as well as the rationale for each change, should be included.
A CTA-A must be filed when the proposed amendments to the protocol:
- Affect the selection, assessment, or dismissal of a clinical trial subject
- Affect the evaluation of the clinical efficacy of the drug
- Alter the risk to the health of a clinical trial subject
- Affect the safety evaluation of the drug or
- Extend the duration of the treatment
Protocol changes should also be reflected in the updated informed consent form (ICF), if applicable. Copies of the tracked changes to the ICF should be included with the CTA-A submission.
Quality amendments
Sponsors must file a CTA-A or CTA-N for changes to made to the quality summary of the drug in Module 2 or Module 3, if applicable. Examples may include, but are not limited to, the replacement or addition of a drug substance or product manufacturing site, changes to specifications for the drug substance or product, or shelf-life reductions owing to stability concerns.
Because submission requirements differ between the BRDD and TPD, the applicant should reference the Health Canada issued guidance document for clinical trial4 for detailed information.
Similar to CTAs, CTA-As should be organized and numbered as per the CTD format and submitted via electronic media with a hard copy cover letter as per the specifications in the Health Canada guidance document on preparing drug regulatory activities in the non-eCTD electronic-only format.5 The screening and review timelines for CTA-As are the same as those for CTAs. If the CTA-A is deemed acceptable, an NOL will be issued within the 30-day review period.
CTA notifications
Changes to an application not meeting the criteria for CTA-As should be submitted as notifications within 15 days of the change. Notifications should be submitted electronically and may be implemented immediately after submission.
Notifications may include, but are not limited to:
- Changes to administrative information
- Annual investigator brochure updates
- Updates to the ICF that do not require a protocol amendment
- Changes to the protocol that do not affect the study design or safety of the participants
- Changes to the quality information that do not affect the quality or safety of the drug
- Premature discontinuation of a trial
CTA-Ns can be sent via email to the appropriate directorate in a zipped file with an accompanying cover letter.
Additional post-authorization, pretrial requirements4
Research ethics board review
The proposed trial protocol/protocol amendment and the ICF must be reviewed and approved by a Research Ethics Board (REB) before initiation of a CTA or implementation of CTA-A. If the sponsor receives a refusal from another ministry of health (e.g., another country in a multinational trial) or ethics committee, then a notification should be submitted to Health Canada and the affiliated REB.
An REB attestation form, or a similar attestation, must be obtained and signed by the REB chair that approves the CTA/CTA-A at each site. The form should be retained at the sites and not submitted to Health Canada unless requested.
Qualified investigators
Only one qualified investigator (QI) is allowed per site. The QI must complete a qualified investigator undertaking form or develop similar documentation that meets the requirements of the regulations [C.05.012(3)(f)]3. The form should not be submitted to Health Canada unless requested.
CTSI form
A clinical trial site information (CTSI) form for each participating site should be submitted to the appropriate directorate before starting a clinical trial or implementing a CTA-A (applies to clinical amendments only). In addition, if there is a change in the site address, or if the REB with which the site is affiliated is changed, a new CTSI form should be submitted to Health Canada.
Lot release information (for biologics only)
Biologic lots intended for use in a clinical study are subject to a lot-release program requirement before the lot is used in a clinical study. Previously, all biologics lots used in a clinical study were subject to this requirement. However, as of 8 July 2020, this requirement is applicable only to:
- biologics that contain human-derived excipients, such as human serum albumin
- clinical trials lots that are released outside of the approved specification.7
Importation of clinical trials drugs
If the investigational product is imported, the importer should be authorized by the sponsor. The importer should be included in Appendix 1 of the application form (HC3011) and submitted to Health Canada. Importer information can be submitted with the initial CTA or later when determined.
Importation of additional drugs
For additional drugs (comparator, concomitant, and rescue medications) that have to be imported into Canada, a summary of additional drugs (SOAD) form must be submitted to Health Canada. A Health Canada official will sign the form and return it with the NOL. If the form was not submitted during the initial CTA, it should be submitted as a CTA-N before shipping the drugs to Canada. The signed SOAD form should accompany the shipment.
Labeling requirements
The investigation product should be labeled per section C.05.011 of the Food and Drug Regulations. The regulation applies to both inner and outer labels and commercially available products considered as investigational. Labels are not submitted to Health Canada unless requested.
Post-authorization, post-commencement requirements4
Changes to previously authorized CTA
Changes to any information submitted as a part of the initial CTA should be submitted to Health Canada. The changes can be submitted as a CTA-A or CTA-N, as discussed earlier in this article, based on the type of change and its impact.
Premature discontinuation of a trial
A CTA-N should be submitted as soon as possible, but no later than 15 calendar days after such decision.
Resumption of a trial after discontinuation
A CTA-N should be submitted with the proposed re-initiation date if there is no change to the authorized study documents. In the event a protocol or quality information is amended to facilitate the continuation of the trial, a CTA-A may be required, depending on the nature of the changes.
Study completion/site closures
A CTA-N to the relevant directorate should be submitted in the event of a site closure or completion of a study.
A study is considered to have been completed after the last subject has complete the end-of-study visit, as defined in the protocol. This does not include study suspension, cancellation, or closure of the trial in Canada. The end-of-study visit is the final visit for study-related tests and procedures, including the capture of any final potential study-related adverse events.
Safety reporting
Health Canada should be informed in an expedited manner of any serious, unexpected adverse drug reactions, as described in the timelines as below:
- neither fatal nor life-threatening, within 15 days after becoming aware of the information.
- fatal or life-threatening, within 7 days after becoming aware of the information. Submit as complete a report as possible within 8 days after initially informed Health Canada of the fatal or life-threatening adverse drug reaction.
Updated investigator's brochure
An updated investigator's brochure, including all safety information and global status, should be submitted annually. If there is a determination that the brochure is not required, a CTA-N stating as much should be submitted.
Record retention
The sponsor is required to maintain complete and accurate records of all trial-related activities. The records are to be retained for 25 years. If any records are requested by the relevant directorate, they must be made available within 2 days.
An alternate pathway for COVID-19‒specific trials8
On 23 May 2020, an Interim Order (IO) was issued regarding COVID-19‒related clinical trials for medical devices and drugs in response to an urgent need for the diagnosis, treatment, mitigation, or prevention of COVID-19. The IO is a temporary measure that provides an alternate pathway to enable the initiation of clinical trials for potential drugs and medical devices for COVID-19 while upholding strong patient safety requirements and validity of trial data. The IO will be in effect for a year.
Health Canada issued two guidance documents to support the IO:
- For drugs: Applications for drug clinical trials under this Interim Order8
- For medical devices: Applications for medical device clinical trials under this Interim Order8
The existing regulations and guidance for all clinical trials that are not COVID-19 related and are not in-scope would continue to apply.
Applicants for COVID-19 drug and medical device clinical trials can apply for authorization under one of the following:
- the IO pathway
- Part C, Division 5, of the Food and Drug Regulations (current regulation)3
- Part 3 of the Medical Devices Regulations9
It is important to note that COVID-19 trials that had commenced before 20 May 2020 cannot be transitioned to the new pathway under IO.
Modernization of clinical trials regulations
Clinical trial business models have evolved from the traditional linear clinical trial model (preclinical, clinical, and post-launch studies) as most of the innovative novel approaches are not suited under current regulations. For example, master protocols, such as basket trials and umbrella trials, are novel designs that facilitate evaluations of more than one investigational medicinal product and/or more than one type of indication within the same overall trial structure. To facilitate such evaluations, the study includes a master protocol/study and sub-protocols/studies, as required. Currently, Health Canada reviews CTAs on a per-protocol basis. In case master protocol trial designs are utilized, a separate CTA should be submitted for each sub-protocol. This leads to an increased regulatory and financial burden. To address such issues, Health Canada is proposing to amend the current clinical trial regulations to introduce a coherent risk-based approach for oversight of conduct clinical trial and enable increased flexibility in the safe development of innovative therapies.11-13 In addition, there are several other modernization initiatives Health Canada is proposing, including a reduced record retention proposal, from 25 years to 15 years, to better align with global regulators.14
Conclusion
Canada continues to be an attractive destination for the conduct of clinical trials. With shorter approval timelines and considerably more universal submission requirements, the Canadian framework will continue to be an appealing option for pharmaceutical companies and research institutions to make significant investments in Canadian clinical trial health research.
Abbreviations
BRDD, Biologic and Radiopharmaceutical Drugs Directorate; CESG, Common Electronic Submission Gateway; CTA, clinical trial application; CTA-A, CTA amendment; CTA-N, CTA-notification; eCTD, electronic common technical document; EU, European Union; FDR, Food and Drug Regulations; HPFB, Health Products and Food Branch; ICH, International Council for Harmonization; IMPD, Investigational Medicinal Product Dossier; NoC, notice of compliance; NOL, no-objection letter; PSEAT, Protocol Safety and Efficacy Assessment Template; QI, qualified investigator; REB, Research Ethics Board; SOAD, summary of additional drugs; TPD, Therapeutic Products Directorate.
References
All websites accessed on 31 July 2020, unless noted otherwise.
- Health Canada. Health products and food branch. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/corporate/about-health-canada/branches-agencies/health-products-food-branch.html. Last modified 8 July 2020.
- Clinical Trials Ontario. Getting started: Conducting clinical trials in Ontario. http://www.ctontario.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/CTO%20Guide%20for%20Companies%20-%20Final.pdf. Not dated.
- Health Canada. Guidance document: Part C, Division 5, of the Food and Drug Regulations ‘Drugs for Clinical Trials Involving Human Subjects’ (GUI-0100). https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/compliance-enforcement/good-clinical-practices/guidance-documents/guidance-drugs-clinical-trials-human-subjects-gui-0100/document.html. Last modified 20 August 2019.
- Health Canada. Guidance document for clinical trial sponsors: Clinical trial applications. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/drug-products/applications-submissions/guidance-documents/clinical-trials/clinical-trial-sponsors-applications.html. Last updated 29 June 2016.
- Health Canada. Guidance Document: Preparation of regulatory activities in the ‘non-eCTD electronic-only’ format. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/drug-products/applications-submissions/guidance-documents/common-technical-document/updated-guidance-document-preparation-regulatory-activities-non-ectd-electronic-only-format.html. Last modified 14 December 2016.
- Health Canada. Filing of clinical trials Frequently Asked Questions. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/drug-products/applications-submissions/guidance-documents/clinical-trials/frequently-asked-questions-filing.html. Last modified 21 February 2008.
- Health Canada. Changes to notification requirements for biologic drugs: Notice to industry. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/covid19-clinical-trials/notice-notification-requirements-biologic-drugs.html. Last modified 8 July 2020.
- Health Canada. Interim order respecting clinical trials for medical devices and drugs relating to COVID-19: Notice. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/covid19-industry/interim-order-respecting-clinical-trials-medical-devices-drugs/notice-interim-order.html. Last modified 27 May 2020.
- Health Canada. Applications for medical device investigational testing authorizations guidance document. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/medical-devices/application-information/guidance-documents/investigational-testing-authorizations-guidance/guidance-document.html. Last modified 2 May 2019. Accessed 4 August 2020.
- Stewart JP, Godard K, Keene D. Health Canada GMP inspections & clinical trials during COVID-19. CAPRA webinar; 11 June 2020. https://capra.ca/en/meetings/webinar-health-canada-gmp-inspections-clinical-trials-during-covid-19-2020-06-11.htm#speakers.
- Health Canada. Forward regulatory plan 2019-2021: Modernization of the regulation of clinical trials. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/corporate/about-health-canada/legislation-guidelines/acts-regulations/forward-regulatory-plan/plan/modernization-regulation-clinical-trials.html. Published 7 June 2019.
- Lee DK. Legislative modernization of clinical trials in Canada. CAPRA Symposium; 27 June 2019.
- Légaré C. Modernization of clinical trials regulations. CAPRA Symposium; 27 June 2019.
- Health Canada. Forward regulatory plan 2019-2021: Alignment of clinical trial record retention timelines. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/corporate/about-health-canada/legislation-guidelines/acts-regulations/forward-regulatory-plan/plan/alignment-clinical-trial-record-retention-timelines.html. Published 28 August 2019.
Acknowledgment
The authors thank Daniel Mannix for his guidance and recommendations during the development of this article.
About the authors
Mukesh Kumar, RAC, is a regulatory specialist with PRA Health Sciences, with more than 6 years’ experience in the pharmaceutical regulatory sector. Kumar has experience in developing regulatory strategies and writing high-quality regulatory submissions (NDS, NDA, SNDS, CTA/CTA-A, 510(k)s) for drugs, biologics, and medical devices. He has a postgraduate certificate in Pharmaceutical Regulatory Affairs from Humber College, Canada. He can be reached at kumarmukesh@prahs.com.
Melanie Oakley has worked for more than 18 years in clinical research, mainly for large contract research organizations. She spent 8 years as a clinical research associate before switching to regulatory affairs, 8 years ago, while living and working in the UK. Oakley’s current role as a manager of global regulatory affairs at PRA Health Sciences includes preparation and submission of Canadian clinical trial applications. She can be reached at oakleymelanie@prahs.com.
Citation Kumar M, Oakley M. Overview of the Canadian clinical trial application process and alternate pathway for COVID-19‒related trials. Regulatory Focus. August 2020. Regulatory Affairs Professional Society.
Comments
Post a Comment